The Textbook of Architecture

Rules · Structure · Materials · Roofs

Timber spans where stone cannot

Weight for weight, timber is many times stronger in bending than stone; long spans in trabeated buildings are therefore roofed with timber beams resting on stone walls and columns.

bending strength ÷ density: oak ≈ 70 · limestone ≈ 3 (kPa per kg ⁄ m³)

An oak beam spanning eight metres is safe; try the same span in limestone. Open in Models ↗

A timber beam is light and strong in tension along the grain, so its own weight costs it little. This is why the widest columned halls of antiquity (the Persian apadanas, whose columns stand almost nine metres apart, and the Mycenaean megarons) were roofed with cedar or other timber, while Egyptian halls roofed entirely in stone needed their columns close together.

The difference also explains the proportions of columns. Where columns carry timber, they can be slender and widely spaced, as at Persepolis; where they carry stone architraves and stone roof slabs, they must be massive and close, as at Karnak.

Related rules

Cite this page Chris Paton, “Timber spans where stone cannot”, The Textbook of Architecture, https://textbookofarchitecture.com/rule/stone-versus-timber. Text, drawings and models licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0.