The Textbook of Architecture

Part II · Chapter 1

The Anatomy of an Order

Pedestal, column, entablature and the module that binds them

PlateAn order and its parts. Changing the order or the authority redraws each member to the proportions that author gives. Open in Models ↗

An order, in the language of classical architecture, is a column together with the beam it carries, designed according to one of a small number of agreed systems. There are five: Tuscan, Doric, Ionic, Corinthian and Composite. Each has its own proportions, its own profiles and its own ornament, and each carries a character (sturdy or slender, plain or rich) that architects have used for two and a half thousand years to give buildings a voice.

The word itself tells us something. An order is an arrangement: it fixes not only the look of a column but the relation of every part to every other part, so that from a single dimension (the thickness of the column at its foot) the whole can be generated. This is why the orders suit a book like this one so well. The figure above is computed from a table of numbers, with a different set for each author.

Three parts, and three again

Read an order from the ground up. It may stand on a pedestal, itself a miniature building with a base, a plain block called the die, and a small cornice or cap. Then comes the column: its base, the long shaft and the capital. Above the column lies the entablature, which is again divided in three: the architrave, the frieze and the cornice.

These divisions are not arbitrary. The entablature is a stone memory of a timber roof. The architrave is the main beam laid from column to column; the frieze is the zone where the ceiling joists rested on it, and in the Doric order their ends are still represented as triglyphs; the cornice is the projecting eaves, whose overhanging corona throws rainwater clear of the wall. Vitruvius tells this story of carpentry turned into stone in Book IV, and whether or not it is literally true it explains a great deal about the form.

Fig. 1The entablature of the Doric order (in red): architrave, frieze of triglyphs and metopes, and cornice. Open in Models ↗

The module

Everything in an order is measured in modules. The basic unit is the lower diameter of the column shaft, written D in this book. Vitruvius, for the Doric, and Vignola, for all five orders, used half of it, the radius, as the module M, and subdivided it into twelve or eighteen parts for the details. A Vignola Corinthian column is thus 20 modules high, and its capital 2⅓ modules.

The module is what Vitruvius meant by symmetry: not mirror-image balance but commensurability, the property of being measured by a common unit. A building proportioned in this way can be built at any size and keep its character. When the text of this book says that the Ionic column is “nine diameters”, it means that whatever the size of the column, its height is nine times its lower thickness.

Vignola’s shortcut

Of all the systems, the one by Giacomo Barozzi da Vignola is the easiest to remember and was for three centuries the most used. Vignola gives a single rule for every order: the pedestal is a third of the column, and the entablature a quarter. Put another way, divide the total height into nineteen parts; give four to the pedestal, twelve to the column and three to the entablature. Without a pedestal, divide by fifteen. Only the column height, measured in modules, differs from order to order.

Vignola’s orders. M = module (½ D). Entablature = ¼ column, pedestal = ⅓ column.
OrderColumn (M)Column (D)Entablature (D)Pedestal (D)
Tuscan1471¾2⅓
Doric16822⅔
Ionic1892¼3
Corinthian20102½3⅓
Composite20102½3⅓

You can check the rule in the figure at the head of this chapter: switch on the labels and read the dimensions. Then switch the authority to Palladio or Scamozzi and watch the numbers drift. The disagreements between the authorities are the subject of a later chapter; the important point for now is that every author proportions every part to the same module.

The column and its shaft

A classical column is never a simple cylinder. Its shaft diminishes: it is thinner at the top than at the bottom, usually by a sixth. And the diminution is not straight but slightly convex (the curve called entasis), so that the shaft seems to swell gently under its load rather than pinch in at the waist, as a straight taper appears to do. Vignola’s method, used for every Renaissance column in this book, keeps the lowest third of the shaft cylindrical and curves the rest along a line found with a quarter-circle.

Shafts may also be fluted. The Doric has twenty shallow flutes meeting in sharp edges (arrises); the Ionic, Corinthian and Composite have twenty-four deeper ones separated by flat fillets. Flutes catch the light in thin vertical lines that make the column look taller and more alive. The Tuscan is left plain.

Fig. 2Greek Doric: twenty flutes with sharp arrises, no base. Open in Models ↗
Fig. 3Ionic: twenty-four flutes with fillets, Attic base. Open in Models ↗

The alphabet of mouldings

Look closely at a classical base, capital or cornice and you will find it is made of a few simple profiles combined in different orders. These are the mouldings, and there are essentially eight of them. The fillet is a small flat band. The torus is a large half-round, the astragal a small one. The scotia is a deep hollow; the ovolo a convex quarter-round and the cavetto a concave one. The two S-shaped mouldings are the cyma recta, hollow below and round above, and the cyma reversa, round below and hollow above.

Fig. 4The eight classical mouldings, each run along a short length of stone. Turn the plate to see how each catches light and shadow. Open in Models ↗

Convex mouldings catch the light; concave ones hold shadow. A good profile alternates them, separating each curved member with a crisp fillet, so that from a distance the cornice reads as a clear sequence of light and dark bands. The Attic base is the classic example: two tori separated by a scotia, each edged with a fillet. Its lower torus is larger than the upper, so that the base seems to settle firmly on its plinth.

Fig. 5The Attic base: plinth, torus, scotia, torus, with fillets between. Open in Models ↗

Character

Vitruvius believed that the orders imitated human bodies (the Doric a man, the Ionic a matron, the Corinthian a young girl) and that each suited a particular kind of god. The Renaissance extended the idea: Serlio recommended the Tuscan for fortresses and prisons, the Doric for churches dedicated to soldier saints, the Corinthian for churches of the Virgin. The hierarchy of the orders from plain to rich, from strong to delicate, became a way for a building to announce what it was for.

The following chapters take the orders one by one, in the sequence Serlio fixed: from the plainest to the richest.

Cite this page Chris Paton, “The Anatomy of an Order”, The Textbook of Architecture, https://textbookofarchitecture.com/chapter/anatomy-of-an-order. Text, drawings and models licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0.